In this regard, many people think of a version control system as a sort of Subversion can operate across networks, which allows it to be used by people on different computers.At some level, the ability for various people to modify and manage the same set of data from their respective locations fosters collaboration.No grand hypothesizing, no visionary pronouncements here—open eyes and accurate note-taking are what's needed most.What I love about this book is that it grew out of just such a process, and shows it on every page.Do branches and tags work the same way as in other version control systems? Frustrated at seeing the same questions day after day, Ben worked intensely over a month in the summer of 2002 to write , a 60-page manual that covered all the basics of using Subversion.
And because the work is versioned, you need not fear that quality is the trade-off for losing that conduit—if some incorrect change is made to the data, just undo that change.
When O'Reilly decided to publish a full-length Subversion book, the path of least resistance was obvious: just expand the Subversion handbook.
The three coauthors of the new book were thus presented with an unusual opportunity.
With Subversion, as with all active free software projects, It is important not to let the perfect become the enemy of the good, even when you can agree on what perfect is. As unpleasant as it is to be trapped by past mistakes, you can't make any progress by being afraid of your own shadow during design.
In the world of open source software, the Concurrent Versions System (CVS) was the tool of choice for version control for many years. CVS was open source software itself, and its nonrestrictive modus operandi and support for networked operation allowed dozens of geographically dispersed programmers to share their work.