A city with a thriving singles population -- otherwise, there will not be a pool of individuals to meet and date among.Are singles typically a net economic gain or loss for cities?What should singles be looking for when choosing a city? Be sure to live somewhere with parks or opportunities to hike.In addition to job and cost-of-living considerations, choose a city that provides opportunities for you to explore your interests and values. This will afford you opportunities to make friends with similar interests, which promotes higher levels of well-being and life satisfaction.When looking at an online profile, look for those shared activities that both you and your date enjoy, that may not cost much but allow for interaction and conversation.Even if you find out you are not compatible, at least you will have spent the time doing something you enjoy.Naturally, not one city is ideal for all single people.
People who are single are more different than they are the same; they vary by age, interests, political leanings, partner preferences, and goals.
If you do have to move for work, try to find a location in the area that does this while maintaining a reasonable commute (an hour each way doesn’t allow much time for hobbies). In addition, this has the added advantage of putting you in proximity of potential romantic partners with similar interests and values, should you decide to find a partner.
This will ensure your partner can naturally become a part of your social network and, if the relationship lasts, puts you on the same page in terms of where to live when moving in the future.
I think they would be an economic gain as they may have more disposable income, since they are not in a family situation.
Should local authorities work to make cities more attractive to singles? Attracting singles could potentially revitalize/stimulate a city's economy.